Executive summary
To support nature’s recovery, the Welsh Government’s Biodiversity Deep Dive developed a set of collective actions. The 30 by 30 target was chosen as a strategic focus to consider where and how action could be accelerated thereby conserving and effectively managing at least 30% of our land, freshwater, and seas for biodiversity by 2030. It is one of a number of targets which form part of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF).
Effective and affordable monitoring and evidence frameworks are vital to track our progress towards both the 30 by 30 target and the longer-term nature positive ambition. They underpin decision making, to enable an adaptive management approach which is necessary to deliver resilient ecosystems able to adapt to wider pressures such as climate change. These frameworks need to be informed by an appraisal of data needs, building on existing good practice and data sets, and identifying what is needed in the future. Also creating opportunities for better collaboration, an increased role for citizen science and making better use of technological advances.
The Deep Dive monitoring and evidence expert group (the group) was established in May 2023 in response to the recommendations from the 2022 Biodiversity Deep Dive.
The group met monthly to:
Membership was drawn from Welsh Government, agencies, academia, eNGOs, and National Park Authorities, bringing together key areas of technical expertise, policy work and delivery.
The report reflects the views of the expert group and outlines the progress towards the monitoring and evidence recommendation in the Deep Dive. The group’s work was undertaken under the following seven themes:
The report explores the themes discussed, progress made to date and emerging recommendations, followed by next steps.
An initial starting point for work was to understand the wide array of monitoring being undertaken in Wales to help inform the approach to the 30 by 30 target and identify opportunities.
The group explored a range of conceptual models to ensure any framework had the potential to address evidence needs at a range of scales whilst having regard to Sustainable Management of Natural Resources (SMNR) principles and the drivers and pressures impacting the environment.
A range of potential metrics were selected based on their potential measurability, precision, consistency, and sensitivity. They were split into three areas, each with a specific role to play in evaluation:
Delivery: ensuring we are clear over achievement of target three.
Tracking: providing a clear map of progress in delivery across a range of aspects of target three.
Outcome Assurance: ensuring that outcomes are producing the desired impact.
Issues and evidence challenges were identified which would impact delivery, these require further development work before costed options can be produced.
The priority development areas include the following:
The group sets out in Table 1 the recommended monitoring framework to evaluate target three and in Table 2 the recommended evidence sources required for delivery of target three. The suggested metrics may have differing implications across the environmental domains, not only as a result of the way ecological processes work in different environments but also as a result of the history of evidence collection in these environments.
Table 1: Recommended monitoring framework to evaluate delivery of target 3.
Table 2: Recommended evidence sources required for delivery of target 3.
Establishing a community of practice to build collaboration and oversee and coordinate delivery of the workstreams would support implementation of the framework. The group developed key principles to inform the next stages in delivery. It is hoped these principles together with the recommended framework, development areas and proposed collaborations will contribute to the route map for 2030.
During discussions a number of emerging principles were noted and are summarised below.
Equitable governance as defined by the GBF will be embedded in every aspect of representation, decision making and distribution that relates to the work of this group moving forwards.
Sharing enabling data:
Adequate, effective data availability is key to enabling both informed delivery on the ground and national level planning. Ensuring the FAIR principles are adopted in our data is key i.e. findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. In some cases, this will need to be supported by subject matter experts to enable effective use.
Tracking progress:
Delivering ecosystem change can take time, be complex and is often challenging. Given such issues we will need to ensure our metrics are sensitive enough to start to demonstrate early change to help map and understand progress. Such tracking will also enable the communication of the route to delivery.
Understanding baselines:
To understand how we are progressing there is a need to have a clear understanding of our baseline against which we can track progress.
Being realistic over delivery:
There is a collective recognition that delivery needs to sit within tight fiscal constraints together with the practical time constraints associated with the work. However, delivery is not cost neutral and appropriate resourcing will be necessary.
Recognising target three as part of a suite of targets:
Given the suite of targets set down under the GBF, it is sensible not to regard target three in isolation but as part of a wider series of targets each focussing on different aspects of action or outcome aiming at achievement of the 2050 vision.
Author(s):
C. Davies1 | D. Lloyd1 | K. Stothard2 | S. Spode2 | J. Skates2 | K. Wade2 | D. Allen1 | T. Hatton-Ellis1 | M. Camplin1 | R. Lucas3 | J. Bailey4 | K. Medcalf5 | C. Cheffings6 | J. Davies7 | R. Price7 | A. Rowe8 | S. Smart9 | R. MacDonald-Lofts10 | J. Hawley10 | A. Smith11 | M. MacDonald11 | F. Burns11 | K. Boughey12 | D. Hill13 | M.Rhydderch1 | H. York1
1Natural Resources Wales
2Welsh Government
3Aberystwyth University
4British Ecological Society
5Environment Systems Ltd.
6Joint Nature Conservation Committee
7Bannau Brycheiniog National Park Authority
8Local Environmental Records Centres Wales
9UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
10Wales Environment Link
11RSPB
12Bat Conservation Trust
13Swansea Council
Initial recommendations of the 30 by 30 Monitoring and Evidence Expert Group for Wales
PDF 107 KB Language: English
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology. Request a different format.